<–adman!–>

Let’s be clear, Candy Crowley of CNN, telling voters whatever they want to hear is not a campaign strategy and is not in any way an honest appeal to voters! With each passing day, I am coming to believe that Candy Crowley is quite dense and does not articulate an original thought or perform any independent analysis of her stories.

Candy Crowley is the epitome of a talking head who simply reads cue cards. OK, Candy, let me break it down for you, Hillary Clinton is a lier and tells voters what they want to hear. She will do anything, now that her campaign is broke, to gain (FREE) media visibility and play into the short sited inclinations of voters. Candy Crowley is yet another “gigantic” name on my ever-growing list of media/entertainment talking heads who does not have the professional capacity to be unbiased in her “reporting.” Funny, I used to like Candy Crowley, until her coverage of the obama/clinton battle began to nauseate me.

It is OK and completely understandable for everyone to have a favorite candidate. But when you are commonly accepted as a newscaster, it is incumbent upon you to refrain from letting your personal opinion tarnish the news that you are supposed to be reporting.

Back to Clinton lacking voter appeal. It is almost unanimously agreed upon by leading economists that the “gas tax holiday,” the ridiculous idea first proposed by john boy “imp” mccain, is a very bad idea. Of course, Hillary jumped on mccain’s bandwagon and endorsed the idea. Despite all of her whining about having so much experience, I am still not clear as to what original ideas she has proposed.

I have suggested in several previous posts that Hillary Clinton is more akin to right wing republicans than any democrat i have seen in recent decades. In fact, it was even said during one of tonight’s broadcasts of of discussion between national politcal pundits that the gas tax holiday may be the single worst proposed policy idea put forth during the entire campaign.

Where exactly can Hillary’s “testicular fortitude” be found? It certainly is not present in her campaign nor in her integrity. What America needs the least at this low point in our country’s history is someone who wants to serve out Bush’s third term and will do anything to accomplish that goal.

Let’s be clear, Hillary “you’re a bitch” clinton. You are the very last person I can think of right now who has the integrity to be America’s next president. pandering to voters, scratching the scab from our nation’s racist woulds and teasing voters with poposals and ideas that will never be enacted or supported by legistaters is disingeneous, to say the least. The reality is that voters have a short memory and even if Billary is elected in the general, she is not likely to make good on any of her promises.

Come on Hillary. If anyone should know when it is time to leave the party it is you. You remind me of the fat girl in high school who slept around. being the school slut made her feel good about herself and she was happy to get any attention, even bad attention. you are the slut of the democratic party and you will do anything to get attention for yourself, even if you infect the entire democratic party with aids. after all, you are operating from the perspective that you have nothing to lose. since you are already at the bottom of the barrel, you can only go up.

Give me a break. John McCain is not a war hero. What has he done that elevates him to “hero” status, beyond what every soldier does? If McCain is a war hero simply for serving in our volunteer military, then so shall everyone be deemed who serves in the military.

The obvious question is why mccain refuses to fund the VA Bill? mccain is running his presidential campaign on the backs of our service men and women, yet he refuses to vote for a bill which would provide them with the services that reflect the debt that they have paid on behalf of all Americans.

The Veteran’s Lobby should be all over this, relentlessly! Mccain is an insincere, racist pig.

What exactly will it take for the American people, especially those “working class, uneducated, white voters,” to vote their economic interests and not fall for the race baiting political stunts put forth by billary clinton and the right wing?  By the way, the working class, uneducated, white voters that hillary is attracting so well and that she claims obama cannot speak to have been traditionally called WHITE TRASH or RED NECKS.  It is interesting though not surprising that this group is the one with which hillary clinton has best connected.

While these folks are busy being distracted by the clintons and right wing to worry about lapel pins, pastors and patriotism, we are getting fucked left and right in the light of day.   In the mean time, bush and cheney are preparing to wage yet another illegal war, this time against Iran.  The economy is sinking like a rock, gas prices are now in the stratosphere, food is becoming scarce, we are no closer to “winning” the war in iraq than we were the day we invaded that country.  Osama Bin Laden is STILL safely going about his daily business…..and the list goes on.

Oh, and by the way, john boy “imp” mccain, is so weak and spineless that he will be yet another president in title while dick cheney runs the country.

Well, what more can I say that has not already been said?  I am pleased to see that the Reverend Wright issue might finally be (mostly) in the past.  Although, I do find it distressing on a number of levels that the cable media have been so consumed with this issue that our political process has been reduced to entertainment television.  It seems as though intellectual political discourse is a thing of the past and that programming executives have come to wrongly believe that the American public only wants to view mudslinging, name calling, combative discourse, and sarcastic humor injected into what is supposed to be “news.”

Too bad Reverend Wright has an ego so large that he cannot see that his personal views on the world are in no way more important than his attempt to derail the presidential campaign of the most promising politician that this country has seen in several decades.  On the other hand, a more tempered presentation by Wright of his political and religious perspectives might have, at minimum, fueled ongoing discussions about race that need to take place in this country.

I came across the subject of False Flag Prospects on one of my favorite sites, OpEdNews.  After doing a search in Google, I found an interesting article, which I have posted below.  Please visit the site for more information and do some research on your own.

False Flag Prospects, 2008 — Top Three US Target Cities by Captain Eric H. May

Global Research, February 23, 2008

APFN

Email this article to a friend Print this article

The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out. As I’ll detail below, this is exactly how government perpetrators in the US and UK handled the 9/11 and 7/7 “terror” attacks, which were in reality government attacks blamed on “terrorists.” Although ill health keeps me from working as hard in the area of false flag analysis as I used to, the urging of independent editors and brother intelligence officers has prompted me to write this essay. I’ll keep it short for readers with limited time, but I will include invaluable links for those who want to delve deeper and understand better. My aim, as a former military intelligence officer who spent five years with the U.S. Army 75th Division conducting military war games, is to convince the American people that the “next 9/11″ — constantly promised by officials and the media — is likely to be carried out under the guise of future military exercises. If the American people are aware of pending exercises and the danger they represent, then the exercises cannot “go live” and effect the very terror events that they are supposed to be rehearsing against. Military Exercises The 9/11, 2001 attacks in the United States and the 7/7, 2005 attacks in the United Kingdom both have smoking guns proving that the mass murderers were not foreign terrorists but domestic tyrants. Each country’s government was conducting military exercises that simulated the exact events that were to occur. The US 9/11 Commission stumbled across strong evidence of treason by Dick Cheney when it interviewed Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, who was present in Cheney’s famous command bunker as Flight 77 sped toward Washington, DC. Cheney was at the center of national military exercises simulating terrorist hijackings of US aircraft — at the very time that those hijackings were occurring in real life. On May 23, 2003, Secretary Mineta testified: “During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” 9/11 Commission co-chairman Lee Hamilton failed to follow up on the bombshell revelation, and quickly switched the topic. Thanks to YouTube, Mineta’s astounding revelation and Hamilton’s amazing reaction are both viewable on a three minute clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y In the case of the 7/7 London railway bombings, there is same-day evidence in a BBC interview with former Scotland Yard anti-terrorism agent, Peter Power, who was a contract employee working in government exercises: POWER: “At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing up right now.” BBC HOST: “To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running the exercise?” POWER: “Precisely.” For a one minute excerpt containing the statements above, refer to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc Mainstream Media It goes without saying that serious media inquiry would quickly ferret out the facts demonstrating high treason in the cases of 9/11 and 7/7. It also goes without saying, unfortunately, that the traitors behind the two false flag attacks understood this very well, and would not have done what they did without a green light from a collaborative media. Three World Trade Center buildings collapsed in New York City on September 11, 2001: WTC 1 and WTC 2 (the Twin Towers) in the morning, and WTC 7 (the Salomon Building) at 5:20 p.m. EST. Given that all three buildings were said to be unexpected collapses by all official sources, there is no good reason — except for complicity — to explain how it is that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty minutes before it happened: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc&feature=related Fox news damned itself by announcing that WTC 7 had collapsed — even as it showed a live shot of downtown New York with WTC 7 still standing. A few seconds later the building collapsed, understandably confusing the newscasters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwUJ9MhzgK The owner of all three buildings was Larry Silverstein, who had recently doubled the insurance value of the Twin Towers. Amazingly, “Lucky Larry,” later stated in a PBS interview that he and the New York Fire Department agreed to a controlled demolition of WTC 7. Since skyscrapers are not wired for demolition — unless someone intends to demolish them — Silverstein’s statement is an admission that 9/11 was an inside job: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100 “The Noble Lie” I believe that on the strength of the five YouTube links above an objective investigation would have more than enough evidence to warrant impeachment of Bush and Cheney on a charge of high treason, and to summon a grand jury that would indict many others on charges of high treason against Larry Silverstein and other apparent 9/11 collaborators. I believe that the American people, if presented with a single news story containing the five YouTube links above, would demand that the case of high treason be carried to its logical conclusion. Congress, though, won’t impeach the president. The mainstream media, for which I used to write, will not investigate and report the story. The military that was used as a tool to mass murder American citizens will not take action against traitors in uniform who knew exactly what they were doing on 9/11, or the many more uniformed dupes who thought they were conducting military exercises until the events of 9/11 occurred. To this day there have been no adverse actions — which would require investigation and evaluation — against any military person involved in what even official apologists call the greatest defense failure in American history. All of this shows that the fix is in, and that we are in a fix. The high officials, media executives and military officers who are bound by law and ethics to serve the American people have become a textbook example of a grand conspiracy. To look at it from their point of view, they are historic actors who are beyond good and evil, who must stimulate the American people to a necessary geostrategic adventure by any means necessary. To them, the official account of the 9/11 “terror” attacks is what Plato once described as the “noble lie,” a necessary falsehood told to a childlike public in order to direct it maturely. The simple fact is that 9/11 has justified an attempt to seize and control the ultimate geostrategic resource: oil. He who controls Middle East oil controls the world. Top Three US Target Cities Last year I published “Next 9/11, Summer 2007?” in response to the same kind of requests that have led me to publish this essay as a 2008 update. My 2007 three most likely cities for the next 9/11 were Houston, Chicago and Portland. This year the same three cities are still most endangered, in light of the fact that the US military has designated Texas, Indiana and Oregon as three of its four target states in the 2008 version of its Noble Resolve military exercises. Granted, Chicago is in Illinois, not Indiana, but Indiana is quite close, and has been used to stage forces for terror exercises conducted in Chicago in recent years. It may come as a surprise to people not acquainted with military preparations that the same cities remain on the list even though analysts like me have publicized them widely. There are considerable difficulties in setting up the political, police, military and media players necessary to support a false flag attack. While many in the 911 truth movement believes that national military forces can simply hit any city at any time, it’s not so easy — thank God. Fortunately, this means that those of us who study false flag prospects and focus on most likely targets; regrettably, this means that target cities can’t breathe easy just because they have detected, exposed and preempted a single false flag attempt. Here is a brief target analysis of the top three cities: Primary Target: Houston. Over the past four years military and police veterans like me have been alerting the public to government exercises aiming at the nuclear destruction of Houston petro-suburbs. Five times in those four years we were able to predict to within a day major petrochemical explosions in those petro-suburbs. The odds against this kind of accuracy are astronomical. As the center of Big Oil and the Bush Family, Houston remains the most endangered city in America. Any patriotic group, like mine, trying to alert its home city to the dangers of a false flag attack should read my recent article, “The 1/31 Nuke: Proof for Ron Paul” about the successful interdiction of a 2006 attempt against Texas City: http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/08/01/28/may.htm Secondary Target: Chicago. While Houston is the most endangered city, the most endangered building — the best candidate to be the next World Trade Center — is the Sears Tower. Official sources have pronounced it just that ever since the original 9/11 attack, when they said it was on the Al Qaeda hit list. Larry Silverstein, who bought the Twin Towers two months before 9/11, led a group that purchased the Sears Tower on 3/11, 2004, the day of the Madrid bombings. Federal officials have been pointing to Chicago and its Sears Tower as Al Qaeda targets since the original 9/11 attacks, and have repeated the threat ever since. In May 2006,, the government scheduled secret 9/11-type exercises in Chicago, while Chicago Mayor Daley was docked conveniently away in Israel for his first visit there. I sent a widely read communiqué to Illinois Governor Blagojevich as part of a successful Internet attempt to shut down the pending false flag attack: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2006/05/ghost_troop_com.html Tertiary Target: Portland. Portland, called “Little Beirut” by Bush cronies because of its enmity to Bush 41 and Bush 43, only made my top three list last summer, when it was designated as a target for a nuclear attack by successive exercises Noble Resolve and TOPOFF. The language in an official press release stated the case plainly enough: “Noble Resolve will coordinate with officials in Oregon to model a nuclear attack on Portland.” In the course of researching Portland for a series of articles I wrote about the city and its exercises. I discovered that Stanford and Harvard had prepared a detailed nuclear fallout map for it, that national military commanders and state National Guard commanders were telling different stories about what the exercises were trying to accomplish, and that Portland’s The Oregonian newspaper was doing everything it could to avoid investigating the frightening anomalies. I wasn’t at all surprised that the last day of the exercises found the Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff in downtown Portland, which was largely closed down by an “unexpected” bomb threat. For another professional perspective on how great the danger was — and may be again — I refer the reader to the analysis of my colleague, Major William B. Fox (USMC): http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=2006&z=186 Postscript “Good morning. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison.” — George W. Bush, Feb. 13, 2008 I can’t think of a more important question than the one of where the next 9/11 will be attempted. Common sense dictates to all of us who understand the truth about 9/11 that its perpetrators must strike again. Indeed, every directive, act and decision of our post-9/11 unitary executive, cowards Congress and Judas judiciary has increased the power of the federal government to wage the Global War and impose the Homeland State. Why on earth would those already guilty of high treason, mass murder and war crimes fail to follow up on their earlier efforts? They understand quite well that the Global War is going badly and the Homeland State is becoming onerous, and that only a reapplication of false flag terror will force the American people to proceed with our post-9/11 national insanity. Still, for every one person who republishes or constructively comments on this essay, there will be another who employs division, abuse and ridicule against me or anyone else who asserts the common sense point that false flaggers will continue to false flag, just as murderers will continue to murder and robbers will continue to rob. It’s Newtonian in its simplicity: things continue to drift the way they are drifting until they are stopped. We can only stop the deadly drift of America by understanding 9/11 and anticipating the next 9/11. Many of the vociferous voices impeding our understanding and anticipation are performing a vital service for treason. The federal government once used counterintelligence programs (COINTELPRO) against the Vietnam era antiwar and civil rights movement, and common sense would suggest that they are using it again in the post-9/11 era, this time against the antiwar and 911 truth movement. The most dangerous voices of all our those from false friends who have infiltrated us to confuse us until the traitors who carried out 9/11 can repeat their performance. Captain May is a former Army military intelligence and public affairs officer, as well as a former NBC editorial writer. His political and military analyses have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, the Houston Chronicle and Military Intelligence Magazine. For more information, or his interview schedule, refer to his homesite: http://www.spiritone.com/~pazuu/pow-mia/Ghost_Troop_Captain_Eric_H_May.htm

Global Research Articles by Eric H. May

Start Slide Show with PicLens Lite

So, it is late and i don’t have much time or energy to break it down to simplistic, bite sized pieces for the moron club, with all of the news “reporters” at the helm.   I will just attack the issues one by one…

1.  the notion that “obama lost” could be the lead story after tonight’s contests is ludicrous.  common sense says that obama waged a campaign like no other in history.  lest us not forget that less than two weeks ago, oboma was double digits behind hillary, only to close the gap and wage a “too close to call” campaign in texas.  so, the story is now all spin, with the media jockying to fan the flame of divisive politics.

2.  for someone who is so consistently proported to be “intelligent,” i find there is a flaw in hillary’s flavor of the day rhetoric which “reasons” that becuase she has won the big states, she should be the defacto democratic nominee because it takes a candidate who can carry the big states to have a chance of beating johnny boy imp mccain.  ok, let me help all of you here.  it is completely illogical to compare apples and oranges here.  winning or losing (however closely) the big states when running in primaries against one’s own fellow party member is not related to winning or losing a state.  in general, domocrats will vote for democrats and vice versa.  so, pleeeeeeeeeease, stop with this stupidity that the media continues to repeat that because hillary beat obama in california or texas, obama could not beat mccain in california or texas.

3.  why does this contest have the same feeling as watching brittany spears self destruct on tv?  what i mean is that the political talking heads are acting like the papparazzi with regard to this contest.  i was disappointed but not surprised tonight to hear several “reporters” stating that one reason that obama likely lost to clinton is because of his lack of “fight” or his ability to counter hillary’s attacks.  well, i would say that it is clearly intentional on his part not to sling mud and shred the democratic party as the clintons have done.  i wrote in one of my posts a few weeks back about the clintons appearing in my eyes to be more “republican” than democrat.  i had no idea at the time the extent to which i was correct in that statement.  it is not plausable that obama and his campaign advisors don’t know about all of the MANY skeletons in billary’s closet.  the fact that obama has chosen to be honorable and maintain the high road, actually remaining true to his pledge to “change” things as we know them.    so now, obama is in a no win situation, being forced to kick up dust and sling mud, once again distracting the entire campaign away from the real issues.

4.  again, hillary must know that she cannot win a general election, even if a different monkey were the republican nominee.  sure, there are plenty of folks who have reservations about obama and for whom he represents a question mark in their minds.  but, there is an enormous difference between that scenario and the legions of people who actually HATE hillary and bill clinton.  if hillary is the nominee in the general election, be prepared to see “no votes” from all of the new voters that obama has brought into the political process and a sever onset of apathy from the seasoned democrats who simply cannot stomach hillary clinton.  hillary clinton is a self centered bitch, she is an evil, kenniving, egomaniac, wicked person.  somehow, i find it extremely difficult to imagine hillary sitting down with any meaningful head of state and gaining their respect while also being perceived as honest.  she has already damaged her global credibility and with that cackle of hers, huge teeth, menacing eyes, and history of criminal wrong doing, how on earth can she restore our country’s dignity?

5.  lastly, i have not had the time or stomach to write about chris matthews.  i will address this topic at another time and will state that cmbc should really make an effort to enforce some sense of neutrality in the newsroom.  if their talking heads are going to be so blatant in their coverage of the campaign, then a disclaimer should appear at the bottom of the screen for the duration of the broadcast.  it is quite obvious that chris matthews is a close personal friend of billary.  he is an embarassment to his “profession” in his constant campaigning for billary during his broadcasts.  the idea that chris matthews actually believes that his audience is so idiotic that i nor others could see through this crap is less than amusing and really speaks to chris matthew’s inability to exercise good judgement.  chris matthews pretends to play the devil’s advocate in his piss poor effort to appear unbiased but it is so bad, that even when he is pretending to bash hillary, he only sets up the opportunity for some other of his “guests” to defend the position.  chris matthews, do all of us a favor, take your shit eating grin, toupe and too much makeup wearing, stained teeth, old ass out to pasture.  you are past your prime and don’t add a single bit of value to your whorish profession, which gives you a sense as to how poor your image is…

6.  why should we have admiration for hillary clinton when she would have lost by double digits, had she not pulled her stank-ass shenanigans over the past week.  pretending not to be sure about obama being of the christian faith, playing into what you knew was not true with regard to the canadian smear, aligning obama with that slum lord in chicago when you know that obama is not at all considered to be a figure related to that trial (payback is a mother fucker and i can’t wait until the clinton shit stained skeletons are revisited).  your scare tactics were less than presidential and outright nasty, certainly unbecoming of someone who wants to be president of the usa.  i actually felt badly for you when you had to face the world in the midst of yet another embarassment by your husband and president bill who was fucking his intern with cigars in the white house.  no i am more clear than ever that that incident didn’t bother you at all and it likely bothered most of us more than it did you.  hillary clinton will never be president and you can rest assured that you and bill will be alongside the bush family in the history books of america, under the “f’s” for FUCK UP.

7.  where are the tax returns?  what about the scandals from your years in the white house?  does whitewater and the rose law firm ring a bell?  you guys are toast and you are so self centered that you actually had the indecency to drag your daughter into all of this, you bitch.

8.  the lack of input and guidance from the democratic party is deafening.  dean, gore, edwards…where the fuck are you guys and why are you not putting a muzzle one the clintons?  is it really in anyone’s best interest to hand the republicans the election on a silver platter?  you guys are real losers.  this is the lowest point in our country’s history, all thanks to the bush family and the republican party, we are fighting a war of unknown proportions, gas is in the stratosphere, the economy is approaching what it was in the great depression, our constitutional rights have been stripped away and the outright fraud, thievery, and nauseating criminal behavior exhibited by the republicans, the democrats are STILL headed toward a defeat in the general election.  good job, guys.

It is a well known fact that hillary clinton cannot win a national election, even against john boy imp mccain. so, why are hillary clinton and bill clinton willing to throw the election back to the republicans? i can tell you for certain, if hillary clinton wins the nomination, i will not vote, period. i am sure that there are many who feel the same.

Hillary, make a note to self, americans are broke, sick and homeless NOT AFRAID!

Hillary clinton is a fear monger.  You should step down from the race and stop trying to destroy president obama.

Hillary, let me repeat this, we the people of the united states of america are BROKE and NOT AFRAID.  this is not to say that most of don’t understand the threat that is represented by the evil forces external and internal to our country.  but we were already suckered by the republicans into being always afraid and we are not willing to do it again.  you might recall that war that you voted to support in iraq.  that war that you and george bush, johnny boy imp mccain and others threw yourselves behind was supported by the american people because they were worked up into such a frenzy of fear, that they were willing to believe all of the lies that were told and suspended their own good judgment.

Once again, Hillary Clinton, you desperate woman.   we the people of the united states of america are BROKE, SICK AND HOMELESS, and NOT AFRAID.

Talk about gone in the blink of an eye. It seems to me that the complete absence of any input from these leaders in the democratic party regarding the contest between obama and clinton is odd. I can only imagine that everyone is trying to hedge their bet and not make a statement that might jeopardize their political futures by getting behind a candidate that turns out not to be the democratic nominee. well, let me say that this only shows the complete lack of integrity and leadership in the democratic party. if the tables had been turned and hillary was in obama’s shoes or if john edwards had been forturate enough be in obama’s place, the party would have coalesced behind that front-runner and asked hillary to step down. but hillary is a white woman and obama is a black man. hillary’s last name happens to be clinton and i am absolutely certain, even in the absence of any evidence, that the clintons have a lot of favors that need to be repaid by current elected democratic officials.

i will only caution those currently in office to think long and hard about your political alliances. the obligation that you have, first and foremost, is to your constituents. you were elected to represent the people by whom you were elected. the american political landscape has changed forever and you can rest assured that voters will no longer allow you or any other elected official to be unaccountable. if your political debts and skeletons in the closet are such that you simply cannot do what is right, then it is your own conscience with which you have to deal.

Come on, people!  If there was really anything of merit to the claim that Obama is a Farrakan supporter, it would have surfaced long before now.  Obama has already stated that he “reject[s] and denounce[es] Farrakan” in totality.  I find a few things odd in the discussion of this issue:

1.  Obama never formally or informally accepted any support of any kind from Farrakan.  A public statement of endorsement by an extremist figure is beyond control by Obama.

2.  Where is the outrage and continual harping of the media regarding the racist statement that was made by the mexican immigrant who is a “high ranking” clinton supporter in texas.  I think that we can all agree that if that so called spokesperson for the mexican immigrant community in texas is willing to make such an obviously strong and racist statement in public, on national television, that she is certainly using the ‘N’ bomb and much stronger and offensive language when the cameras are not rolling.  Hillary clinton did not unequivocally reject this woman’s support and that of the voters that she represents.

3.   Where is the outrage for the racist rants that are spewed every day by the conservatives and right wing republicans, most of which is based in race baitng?  Bill, the O’Reilley, the asshole, can rant about lynching Michelle Obama and there is a deafening silence from the established media, most of which is controlled by the jews, if I may add.  of course, senator obama cannot speak to the issue, lest he be dragged into a ‘no win’ discussion on race and made to acknowledge publically that he is concerned about the state of black america.  of course, hillary can whine about women, and bill clinton can tell lies about his being the first black president, but god forbid if obama talks about being a black man in america.

4.  Why is the voice of the catholic community being silenced in their outrage to the recent endorsement of john boy imp mccain  by the conservative, religious racist, with whom he stood shoulder to elbow (mccain is a dwarf, remember) when accepting the endorsement.

5.  Why hasn’t john boy imp mccain rejected and denounced the conservative radio retards who on a daily basis speak and stoke racism on the airwaves of america?  I will tell you why, it’s because he will do anything to get their political support.

6.  Why are jews so fucking whiny?  Of course, antisemitism is wrong and unacceptable but no more wrong and unacceptable than ANY AND ALL racial hatred.  So, i suppose that i will be “outraged” about any of the shit you care about and when jews are the target of racism, when the jews themselves are outraged about all hatred targeting all races.  Jews, stop whining and spend the same amount of energy denouncing all racism, not just when it is directed toward poor, rich jews.  after all, last I checked, jews are the ones giving the green light to most of the racist, polluted garbage that goes out on the television and radio airwaves, not including the trash that comes out of hollywood to the movie screens across america.

7.  why is obama’s church an issue in his campaign?  i would imagine that it is not uncommon for a church to be subject to an IRS investigation.  is that obama’s fault or problem?  how does that impact obama’s integrity or qualifications to be president?  if that is the case, then potential for a breach of national security is very high given that john boy imp mccain’s wife is an admitted drug addict.  she claims to be drug free, but only her doctor knows.  i am not even going to get into her lame ass excuse about becoming addicted to pain killers as a result of a back injury she suffered.  yeah, right.  rich, white bitches are always using that lame excuse for their drug addictions, rather than taking responsibility for their weakness and actions by just admitting that they liked getting high and became addicted in the process of liking to get high on a regular basis.

8.  why isn’t the democratic leadership taking back room meetings with hillary clinton and preventing her from ongoing attempts to destroy obama?  it seems to me that someone with 35 years of experience would much rather spend their time and limited financial resources reinforcing that experience in the minds of the voters, rather than constantly trying to tear-down the opponent.  i simply can’t get it out of my mind that hillary clinton is all talk, or should i say all bark.  what are hillary clinton’s accomplishments again?

billary clinton continues to lie to the american people and hide their questionable dealings.  they refuse to release their tax returns to the american public.  frankly, it is my belief that most americans already don’t trust the clintons and their refusal to release their tax returns only means that they are hiding something that the public would find objectionable if not illegal.

anyone running for president should be able to anticipate the desire of the public to know the financial details of a presidential candidate….

oh yeah, billary clinton also refuses to release hillary clinton’s meeting calendar from her time in the white house.  of course, hillary clinton blames the delay on george bush but the reality is that hillary and bill clinton are holding on to these records for dear life.  it occurs to me that this meeting calendar is precisely what should provide the details that would substantiate the years of political experience that hillary claims to have.

poor chelsea.

Hillary Clinton is…so annoying.  What a whining bitch!  It’s no wonder that Bill’s intern was sucking his dick in the white house.  Hillary clinton reminds me of kids i recall from 4th grade who would do anything to be noticed. they wined, tattled, threw tantrums, and regularly changed their personalities in their desperate effort to be acknowledged. Hillary Clinton is the annoying kid you remember from elementary school.

Hillary Clinton is so tired and worn out.

Hillary Clinton you have no charisma.

Hillary Clinton you are a boring, old school politician.

Hillary Clinton is desperate.

Hillary Clinton is stoking fears, racism and playing dirty politics.

Hillary Clinton is hypocrytical. you and your whoring husband were in the white house for 8 years and you ‘cleaned house’ alright. word has it that you and bill stole furniture, dishes and other white house valuables when you left the white house.

Hillary Clinton is a bad hire. to put it into her own words, the people of america would hire obama to be president. he is not beholded to drug dealers and other career white collar criminals.

Hillary Clinton says she is ready on day one but has not yet told us what she has done to be qualified. she misrepresents the national interests that she she has promoted the world over and hillary misrepresents her involvement in negotiating a multitude of conflicts the world over. my question is then exactly in what capacity did she negotiate on behalf of the united states? if she was acting in a formal capacity, then i want to know that. if she was acting in any capacity other than as first lady, then i would say that she was overstepping her bounds and her involvement in any past national security or political issues on behalf of the united states while she was the first lady, should be further investigated. IMHO, that is representative of poor judgment on her and her husband’s part. why in the world does a first lady warrant involvement in negotiating peace in ireland?

she is always wolfing for a debate with barrack but she just had the 20th debate last week and she had every opportunity to promote her national security agenda, yet she did not. other than to say, her vote to go to war in iraq was a mistake. hillary clinton wants us to believe that someone with her supposed 35 years of experience qualifies her to be president. my take is quite different. anyone with 35 supposed years of experience that hillary clinton is espousing, should be far more sophisticated and thoughtful and deliberate. thus, with that much experience, if she didn’t have the good sense to not only oppose the invasion of iraq but to also read the intelligence report before casting her vote, then she has already proven that hillary does not possess the good judgment required to “answer the phone at 3 in the morning.”

Give it up hillary, nobody likes you . You have ruined your opportunity to be the first woman president of the unites states and you are not putting the last nail in the coffin of whatever is left of the clinton legacy.

hillary clinton has no integrity, morals, or willingness to do what is best for the nation. you simply are interested in being the first woman president and securing additional power and wealth for yourself and your family.

this is what i can’t wait to see, the newspaper headline reads ” Breaking News:  Hillary Clinton Concedes to Obama and Withdraws Her Candidacy!”

one last think, hillary clinton is not only ugly, she is fat. sure, there is a lot of truth to what she says about being held to a different standard because she is a woman. this standard is actually not as harsh as that to which a black person running for president is held. so, sure hillary clinton may be disadvantaged because she is a woman, hillary clinton may be disadvantaged because she is ugly or less than attractive, hillary clinton may be disadvantaged because her husband is a panty chaser, and hillary clinton is certainly disadvantaged because she is quite fat. but hillary, this is nothing compared to the disadvantage of being black in america. if you didn’t believe this yourself, you and bill would not have thought that playing the race card during the campaign would have been an effective strategy.

i may be the first one to say it but i can’t be the only one thinking it. john boy imp mccain is REALLY UNATTRACTIVE, if not outright U-G-L-A-Y. aside from the fact that he is old as dirt, he is simply unattractive. frankly, everything about him makes me nauseous. on every scale of attractiveness, he fails:

john boy imp mccain is short - now i have never seen nor sought out any reference to his height, but by all appearances, he is short, compared to the average man.

john boy imp mccain is dwarf-like - don’t get me wrong, there is nothing “wrong” with being a dwarf. BUT, i reserve the right to say, however unpolitically correct it may be, I DO NOT want to look at a president for the next four years who has a dwarf -like stature. what the hell is wrong with his arms? every time i see him waive to the crowd or hold that microphone the way that he does, it makes me want to reach out and give him a hand.

john boy imp mccain’s face is ugly - sure, one huge problem for mccain is that he is so fricking old! his fair skin has not held up well and the wrinkles, sun spots, horrible, brown stained teeth and that horrible, gigantic lump on the side of his face all add up to making john boy imp mccain impossible to look at.

john boy imp mccain has a dishonest, ugly smile - there are two things at issue here. the first is that his teeth appear to be stained with brown stuff. maybe they are dentures that are not cleaned, maybe there is coffee residue built up over the years, maybe he smokes cigarettes. i don’t know the why of it, only that his personal groomer should see to it that his teeth are attractive. the second issue with john boy imp mccain’s grin appears unnatural, forced, tight, and dishonest. and he appears to flash that evil, devilish grin at inappropriate times. his grin comes across very much like hillary clinton’s grin, forced and untrustworthy.

john boy imp mccain is bald - of course, most people have lost a significant amount of hair by the time that they reach john boy imp mccain’s ripe old age, but he is balding nonetheless. this is the same issue that i have with huckabee’s hair. that bald spot that flashes you when he is unfortunate enough to be caught from the back by a video camera is disarming.

john boy imp mcain’s wife is frightening - that woman looks devilish, more so than john boy imp himself. why in the world doesn’t she listen to the folks who have told her that that fricking chola style black makeup around her eye is VERY unattractive. she is way to white and old to wear such harsh makeup. sure, she could use a lot more color to balance her ghostly appearance, accented by her over processed bleach blond hair, but thick black eye makeup is not the answer. perhaps she should call hillary’s makeup artist from the ohio debates. that is the absolutely best that hillary has ever looked on tv. one last note to imp mccain’s wife, stop standing behind him on camera, you look like the devil. maybe she is still a druggie and gets high before she puts on her eye makeup…let’s face it, ugly people have to work harder to get anything done.